Patients can sue doctors if they feel they have to have been damaged due to a “medical error”. However, successful lawsuits of this type require the following evidence: The supply was below the ordinary standard of care provided by physicians comparable under similar circumstances. There existed a professional relationship between the doctor and the injured. The patient was affected by the deviation from the standard of care. Concern about lawsuits exercises sometimes in ways pressure on doctors who are not necessarily the result that they are acting in the best interests of their patients. For example, doctors can give tests in order, that are not clearly medically necessary to rule out the possibility that they could be sued because they have neglected something. This approach is for patients risky (eg., By ionizing radiation, the need for invasive and / or unpleasant tests to confirm false-positive results) and costly medical with little use. However, such an approach is not required by law, can not protect necessarily before possible complaints and is generally considered excessive and unreasonable. It is better to explain to the patient the reasons why a particular test or a certain treatment is not recommended. involve the patient in decision making about their care, providing much more to the understanding of the patient. The best defense against malpractice processes is to provide excellent health care and building close and trusting, cooperative relationships with patients.